Lunety Myśliwskie Buty myśliwskie Leica lornetki myśliwskie Swarovski spodnie montaże noże Zeiss Laksen kolimatory Meopta lunety wabik broń Nikon Khales monokular kalosze buty Meindl Seeland Laksen bielizna termoaktywna Harkila Bushnell latarki etui Antonio Zoli CZ Bistana książki myśliwskie Deerhunter Delta Optical dalmierze Point magazynki optyka myśliwska
 |
Sklep myśliwski
Wyróżnione produkty
Sklep myśliwski
Lornetka Eschenbach Bison 8x42B kamuflaż
Eschenbach|Optyka myśliwska » Lornetki myśliwskie » Lornetki Eschenbach
Lornetka Eschenbach Bison 8x42B kamuflaż
Lornetka Eschenbach Bison 8x42B kamuflaż
Jest to poręczny i wyjątkowo trwały model o 8-krotnym powiększeniu. Zostały zastosowane pryzmaty w systemie dachowym , które wykonano z wysokiej klasy szkła Bak-4. Wysokość jakość obrazu uzyskano dzięki pokryciu szkieł wielowarstwowymi powłokami antyrefleksyjnymi. Lornetka jest pokryta gumą, wodoodporna oraz wypełniona azotem, co zapobiega zaparowaniu od wewnątrz.
| Model | BISON 8X42 B |
|
Powiększenie
|
8 x
|
|
Średnica obiektywu (mm)
|
42
|
|
Źrenica wyjściowa (mm)
|
5,25
|
|
Geom.
|
27,6
|
|
Sprawność zmierzchowa
|
18,3
|
|
Okular dla osób noszących okulary
|
Tak
|
|
Min / Max. źrenica wyjściowa (mm)
|
5/15
|
|
Min. / Max. odległość (mm)
|
60/70
|
|
Pole widzenia 1000 m
|
113
|
|
Obiektyw szerokokątny
|
Nie
|
|
Min. odległość ostrzenia (m)
|
2,5
|
|
Wysokość (mm)
|
161
|
|
Szerokość (mm)
|
135
|
|
Głębokość (mm)
|
66
|
|
Waga (g)
|
714
|
|
Wypełnione azotem
|
Tak
|
|
Wodoodporność
|
Tak
|
|
Pryzmaty
|
BaK-4, BK-7
|
|
Powłoka
|
Wysoka przepuszczalność,
multi-powłoka "naturebright"
|
|
Gwarancja
|
10 lat
|
|
WarrantyPlus
|
dostępny w Niemczech
|
Komentarze:
Tara2012-04-25 16:57 |
Never thought I would diaergse with You Willis, but on this I do.Excellent. Good to hear from you.You and US Energy Information Administration compare solar cells with other large scale electricity production alternatives. But solar cell is mainly, as on Your boat, a small scale solution for electrical consumers. I wish this were true. But see my regarding a huge megawatt-scale project in California. The related article said:Assisted by another state law, which mandates that California utilities buy 33 percent of their power from clean-energy sources by 2020, the project’s developers struck lucrative contracts with the local utility, Pacific Gas & Electric, to buy the plant’s power for 25 years.P.G.& E., and ultimately its electric customers, will pay NRG $150 to $180 a megawatt-hour, according to a person familiar with the project, who asked not to be identified because the price information was confidential. At the time the contract was awarded, that was about 50 percent more than the expected market cost of electricity in California from a newly built gas-powered plant, state officials said.Note that that is what PGE is paying, so they will have to sell the power for much more than that.You go on to say:Solar Cells have to be seen from small scale consumer perspective not from a large scale production perspective. With solar cell on my house will I get more independent from large companies, energy taxes and grid utility companies. I love that. Then can can I show them my longest finger. That feeling is worth a lot to me.I have no problem with that provided I'm not asked to subsidize it.Price for PV panels is now below USD1 per watt and falling.Generally not true. are wholesale prices, $1.36 to $2 per watt. But as I pointed out above, that's far from the whole cost of the system. Also, there's a huge oversupply of panels at the moment. The Chinese ramped up big, and then subsidies ran out in lots of countries. So panels are cheap, but not likely to get a lot cheaper in the near future, the market is still correcting. Finally, as I said above, panel costs are a small part of the whole equation.That give in Sunny states a annual output of up to 2 kWh electricity. Grid inverters are now also falling in price. It is in many places now a good investment for consumers but not for producers to get solar panels.The many places are generally places like California, where prices are artificially inflated. I know of nowhere that solar is a good investment where there is no subsidy for solar.I have been in computer business since 1982 and I see a very similar development as the PC went through. Now is large scale computing made by many small PC processors. In the very near future will many small scale PV installations in total be producing larger amount of electricity than large scale production facilities. Just because it is good investment, for consumers.I don't care if it's large or small PV installations, the economics are not that much different. In fact, small installations are generally less efficient than large institutions, which means that prices are higher.And of the joy to get independent. A small scale revolution. ;-)I admire and enjoy independence as much as the next man. If a person is getting paid by the grid to produce power, however, you need to watch out for the hidden subsidies. You say it is a good investment, for consumers .Solar is a good investment in California if a residential customer is paying more than about $160.00 per month. But the reason the customer is being billed that much for their power is because PGE power is so expensive.And why is PGE power so expensive? Because, as the quote above shows, PGE is paying 50 percent more than the expected market cost of electricity in California from a newly built gas-powered plant for solar generated power. So they have to sell it at a high price which is what makes solar a good investment for the consumer around here.So solar is a good investment for consumers, but only because the consumer is already getting screwed to pay for that investment, with the ratepayer shelling out 50% above market for solar power.Thanks,w. |
|---|
Projekt i wykonanie: Fotografia produktowa